How is cyberbullying different from ‘traditional’ bullying?
Charlotte Dodds has reviewed the academic research around the topic and written up a report for Cybersmile! If you're confused by existing research, Charlotte's summary is a great place to start! If you are affected by cyberbullying, follow the links throughout the article for access to our various support services.
This blog entry is going to explore the differences between cyberbullying (bullying that is experienced in cyberspace through social networking sites or text messages for example) and ‘traditional’ bullying (that which is experienced face-to-face). In doing so, I will attempt to establish whether cyberbullying is more of a threat than traditional forms of bullying (If you are affected by bullying online explore the Cyberbullying Help Centre and Total Access Support service for the various ways Cybersmile can help you).
The impact of cyberbullying divides public opinion. Slonje and Smith surveyed 360 adolescents aged between 12-20 years of age to examine the nature and extent of cyberbullying in Swedish schools. The findings were discussed in relation to the similarities and differences between cyberbullying and more traditional forms of bullying which led to some interesting opinions from the study’s respondents. Whilst some people argued that ‘(cyberbullying)…is quite inoffensive compared to traditional bullying…’, others took the view that ‘…cyberbullying hurts the person more psychologically…You become more frightened if you e.g. get a sms [text message] that says: ‘I will kill you’’. So which viewpoint is more persuasive? In what ways could cyberbullying be viewed as more or less of a threat than traditional forms of bullying? Let’s find out…
Cyberbullying could be viewed as more of a threat than traditional bullying because:
1. Anonymity, impersonation and decreased fear of being caught
Cyberbullying differs from traditional forms of bullying in that the identity of the perpetrator is often hidden from the victim by creating a false identity (often by means of a false email account and social networking profile). According to Patchin and Hinduja, only 31% of cyberbullying victims knew the perpetrator, whilst 84% of perpetrators knew their victim.
This has dangerous consequences for the victim of cyberbullying, as online environments provide a platform where the expression of negative emotions is allowed to flourish, minimising the perpetrator’s fear of punishment.
“…the anonymity of the internet allows children and adolescents to adopt a more aggressive persona than they may express in real life.” (Ybarra and Mitchell)
2. Lack of supervision
This is a unique feature of cyberbullying which has worrying consequences for the victim. Although social networking sites and chatrooms are making some effort in regard to security and protection of their members by policing potentially offensive conversations and making it easier to report abuse online, it is unclear how effective these measures are in reducing the effects of cyberbullying on victims.
Furthermore, email communication and text messages are difficult to monitor. Alongside this, many young people have computers in their bedrooms with the potential to hide their behaviour from parents or siblings, which may worsen their behaviour.
3. Victims feel imprisoned in their own homes
Unlike victims of traditional forms of bullying who are able to escape from the torments of the face-to-face bully once they are at home, cyberbullying victims do not have that option. Cyberbullies take advantage of the fact that the majority of young people use technology on a regular basis which provides them with the opportunity to harass their victim at any time and in any place, hence they are likely to feel imprisoned in their own homes, with no ‘safe place’ to go.
“there may truly be no rest for the weary as cyberbullying penetrates the walls of a home, traditionally a place where victims could seek refuge.” (Patchin and Hinduja)
Some forms of cyberbullying such as incidents involving the use and circulation of videos and images are said to have a greater impact on victims’ psychological health than traditional forms of bullying because of the permanency of the internet and the speed in which the video/image can spread to a large audience, humiliating the victim in the process.
In the digital age in which we live, social acceptance and online presence is important in the construction of young people’s identity. As such, it is argued that ‘…cyberbullying can capably wreak psychological, emotional, and social havoc…(furthermore) it is not a stretch to say that physical harm-such as being beaten up-might even be preferred by some victims to the excruciating pain they experience from nonphysical harm because the former can heal quicker’ (Patchin and Hinduja).
“…93% of cybervictims were negatively affected, reporting sadness, hopelessness, depression and anxiety.” (Raskauskas and Stolz)
Cyberbullying is not more of a threat than traditional forms of bullying because:
1. Cyberbullying is an extension of traditional bullying
This argument follows that cyberbullying is related to traditional (face-to face) bullying because often victims of cyberbullying are also victims of traditional bullying. Similarly, cyberbullies are often bullies in the physical world too. As Li states, ‘…cyberbullying should not be differentiated from traditional bullying because it (is) significantly correlated (about 30% of traditional bullies were also cyberbullies and one in three traditional bully victims were also cyberbully victims’). However, whilst the overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying exists, academics warn that the overlap is small and that cyberbullying can be differentiated from traditional bullying in a number of ways (as discussed in the previous section).
Some forms of cyberbullying are said to have an equal impact on victims of traditional bullying and some forms of cyberbullying are considered to be less harmful than forms of traditional bullying. Therefore cyberbullying is not considered to be more of a threat. Smith and others found that bullying via text and social networking sites was of equal impact to traditional bullying, whilst bullying via email, chatroom or instant messaging were thought to have a lesser impact than traditional forms of bullying.
Research by Ortega and others found that cyberbullying victims were not that concerned about their harassment. Interestingly, they also found that cyberbullying victims reported fewer negative emotions than victims of traditional bullying. Furthermore, they found that some pupils viewed cyberbullying as less serious than traditional bullying ‘…because it is not “real” and can be ignored in a way face-to-face bullying cannot’ (arguably this is very controversial and shall be discussed further in the next section).
“The new electronic media have actually created few ‘new’ victims and bullies.” (Olweus)
3. Acts of violence in the physical world are harder to escape than those in cyberspace
This argument holds that victims of cyberbullying ‘…can quickly escape from the harassment by deleting the email, closing the instant message, and shutting off the cellular phone and is largely protected from overt acts of violence by the offender through geographic and spatial distance’, whereas victims of traditional bullying are not and hence the acts of violence are harder to escape.
Whilst scholars such as Patchin and Hinduja maintain that this argument holds some truth, they are not entirely convinced by it. I, too share some reservations as it ignores the fact that victims of traditional bullying can escape the harassment whilst they are at home, which cyberbullying victims cannot. Also, I think there is a misguided belief in the argument that by deleting the email, message, text, the victim is psychologically able to eradicate or ignore the abuse and so the impact is lesser.
To summarise, I believe that the first argument is the most convincing of the two arguments in this blog post- that cyberbullying is more of a threat than traditional bullying. I believe that there are certain features characteristic of cyberbullying which make victims’ experiences particularly harmful. For example, the anonymity of cyberbullies is concerning for victims because it is likely to worsen their behaviour as they do not fear punishment. The inescapable nature of cyberbullying (meaning than victims can be harassed at any time and in any place including their home-traditionally a place of refuge) also worsens victims’ experiences and may increase feelings of depression, isolation and anxiety.
By Charlotte Dodds
For further information about Cybersmile and the work we do, please explore the suggestions below:
- Who Are Cybersmile?
- People We’ve Helped
- Cybersmile Launch Groundbreaking AI Support Assistant
- Cyberbullying And Online Abuse Help Center
- Cybersmile Campaigns
- Stop Cyberbullying Day 2018 Highlights
- Cybersmile Wins Gold At Cannes Lions 2018 For Body Positivity Campaign
- Cybersmile Advisory Panel
- Cybersmile Launch Digital Civility Learning Platform
- Corporate Partnership Program
- Cybersmile Gaming
- Global Support Service
Edur-Baker, O. (2010) ‘Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools’, New Media Society, vol. 12:1 pp 109-125, Sage journals [Online]. Available at: http://nms.sagepub.com/content/12/1/109.abstract [Accessed: 10 August 2014].
Olweus, D. (2012) ‘School bullying: Development and current status’. Orange County Convention Center, 4 August 2012. Available [Online] at: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-08/apa-clf080412.php [Accessed: 20 August 2014].
Ortega, R. Elipe, P. Mora-Mercha, J A. Genta, M L. Brighi, A. Guarini, A. Smith, P K. Thompson, F. Tippett, N. (2012) ‘The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: A European cross-national study, Agressive Behavior, vol. 38:5 pp 342-356, Wiley Online Library [Online]. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ab.21440/abstract [Accessed: 10 August 2014].
Patchin, J W. Hinduja, S. (2006) ‘Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying’, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, vol. 4:2 pp 148-169, Sage journals [Online]. Available at: http://yvj.sagepub.com/content/4/2/148.abstract [Accessed: 10 August 2014].
Slonje, R. Smith, P K. (2008) ‘Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 49:2 pp 147-154, Wiley Online Library [Online]. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x/abstract [Accessed: 10 August 2014].
Smith, P. Mahdavi, J. Carvalho, M. Tippett, N. (2006) ‘An investigation into cyberbullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyberbullying’, National Archives [Online]. Available at:
https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/RBX03-06.pdf [Accessed: 10 August 2014].